Fascination About h4831sc load data

This is often designed to be the "head to" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It is the foundation for a great number of pet loads, however I have not been happy with the outcomes.

They've carried out identically for me. Like Everybody else I rushed to get the more recent SC Edition but have now switched again. Ideally you would like about a hundred% loading density. When you've got enough case capability for the H4831(extensive) you will be almost certainly much better off.

You might be accurate They're exactly the same the SC is short Slice so it meters better, I don't Consider you can find just regular 4831 any more

We’d like in order that you’re eighteen decades of age or more mature right before allowing you to buy our site. Will you be eighteen yrs of age or older?

My practical experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to a similar fat as the very long Reduce demonstrates a lowered velocity.

Given that there will not seem like any "official" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a number of you supply a starting point with this mix and issues to think about when Performing this Load up?

I'm using it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did properly but I used to be just a little concerned about temp h4831sc load data security. I believe I'm at seventy two grains and obtain close to 2850ish fps

If you have some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps discover a load that works Okay with the 4831. The bullets I tried which were over 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the conventional 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the greatest bullet that may stabilize, nevertheless it did that wonderfully. It is a funny-seeking bullet using a rounded nose profile, but it surely shoots great and kills effectively. Deer out to about one hundred fifty yards al went down at once with rib-cage hits.

I've located the precise reverse to get genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Win Mag.

You might have to produce a number of far more posts to receive cleared to carry out PM's. When you get to that position I might write-up during the categorised reloading part to check out if any one is in your area for the trade. Click on to increase...

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're entirely different powders, with IMR 4831 remaining considerably faster when compared to the Hodgdon variants. You should h4831sc load data not handle them as exactly the same powder, because they most certainly will not be.

It's probably that no even more dialogue is needed, where scenario we endorse setting up a new thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is required you can still do so.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced a lot better pace and accuracy with H1000. I'd somewhat utilize a slower burning powder with 215g pills.

If I've a pound or two of the powder and receive h4831 vs h4831sc much more of precisely the same, only another great deal variety, I'll combine all of them up to make sure that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.